Some of you who come here are probably more in the know than I on the proposed “name change” or whatever you want to call it of the Southern Baptist Convention. I, myself, have no problems with the Southern Baptist Convention name. Why change it? How many times has that been asked?
It seems to me we are proposing the change for those who hate God and Jesus Christ to call attention to the idea that we are willing to change to get them come and see what we are about. Now, that could just be a gross misstatement, or mis-understatement; if anything to me it is understated. It says to me that we are willing to change our name that we might just be willing to change some other things in order to accommodate the masses. Now I probably will be unable to attend the convention in New Orleans in June, but I know some of you, at least, will do the right thing and vote against the “change”.
By the way keep in mind that ABC television has a new show coming out that is called the GCB, about what I understand to be about professing Christian women who are nothing more than hypocrites. Mockery of Christ and His own. GCB for ABC means Good Christian B_ _ _hes (the word for a female dog). Used in that context I refuse to use the term. I find it very disrespectful to women of any class. Even if some do not mind being called “female dogs”.
It has been some time since I posted here at ALL THINGS BAPTIST, but I think this is about as Baptist as you can get.
Posted by T. A. Blankenship on March 20, 2012
“It is not expected that we should give a church history in this limited essay. All that will be done is to glance at the existence of the church in each successive century ; and we shall only be able to notice where the true church flourished in one or two places at the same time. . . . Owing to the different languages of those nations where the followers of Christ have lived. and to the asperities of their opposers, the church has been known by the name of Baptists, Anabaptists, Wickliffites, Lollards, Hugonots, Mennonites, Hussites, Petrobrusians, Albigenses, Waldenses, Paulicans, etc.; and to oppose image worship, infant baptism, transubstantiation, and the unwarrantable power of the Pope, have ever been characteristics of this people. . . .
We should keep in mind that nearly every question has two sides; and while the controversy between us and the pedobaptists respects church origin, we are happy to have their full concession that they are recent dissenters from the Roman Catholics; and that the Baptist church is not only the true church of God, but that for her ‘it is easy to trace a succession of witnesses for Jesus Christ against His rival at Rome.’”
(The above quote is from ”The Convert’s Guide to First Principles” by Israel Robords, pastor of the First Baptist Church of New Haven, CT. It was published in 1838, to instruct a large number of new converts in the church from a recent revival. The quote is from pages 78, 79, 97, and 98 of the book. Notice that in 1838 you have a New England pastor referring to a Baptist “succession” and a “true church.” This is just further proof that J.R. Graves and the Landmark movement did not teach anything new in Baptist history. A special thanks to Bro. Steve LeCrone for finding this important quote. Note: The last sentence of the quote includes a phrase from Brown’s Bible Dictionary, p. 152. )
Posted by Tim A. on July 5, 2011
The word “Drift” according to the MERRIAM/WEBSTER DICTIONARY means “to float or be driven along by wind, waves or currents 2: to pile up under the force of the wind or water”
The following is an email from Ben Stratton from the Landmark Southern Baptist list:
Baptists Are Drifting From the New Testament Pattern in Doctrine and Polity
Some Baptists are drifting from these orders because they are failing to teach believers to “observe all things whatsoever” Christ has commanded. Luke tells us that the first church “continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine.”
The New Testament records that believers were accepted into church members by baptism. . . Scriptural baptism is the door into the visible Church of God. A believer coming from another denomination must be baptized to be a member of a Baptist church. The proper way to enter a building is through the door. Baptism symbolizes identification with a (the) faith. It is important that one believe in Christ; it is also important what ones believes about Christ.
Administering the Lord’s Supper to non-Baptists is also a departure from the New Testament pattern. The Lord’s Supper is a family affair and is to be partaken by those of the same faith and order and in good regular standing with the church. The New Testament substantiates this stand.
Being liberal may make one popular with man, but adherence to the scripture will make you popular with God. Let us as Baptists join with Jeremiah in seeking the old paths of doctrine, polity, and morality. J.V. Bottoms, Sr.
(J.V. Bottoms, Sr. was the longtime pastor of the Green Street Missionary Baptist Church in downtown Louisville, Kentucky. He was the first person to graduate from the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary once blacks were allowed to attend there. The above quote appeared in the American Baptist” newspaper in 1978. This paper was the official organ of the General Association of Black Baptists in Kentucky. It is interesting to note that in the 1970′s many of the black Baptist churches in Louisville were much more doctrinally sound than their white counterparts. )
Are Southern Baptists drifting? In many ways we are. We are drifting away from sound doctrine concerning Baptism, the Lord’s Supper, Leadership qualifications, and away from church discipline.
We are drifting toward a crashing falls of destruction, and God will use others who are still standing for the truth, holiness, and glorifying the name of Jesus.
Let’s stand on Jesus and the Scriptures, expose the vile and wicked acts, and language of those who would lead others astray.
-Tim A. Blankenship
Posted by Tim A. on June 29, 2009
J.R. Graves was born in Vermont in 1820. In 1841 he moved south and united with the Mount Freedom Baptist Church in Jessamine County, Kentucky. In May of 1842 Graves was ordained by this church. What is interesting is that three years before J.R. Graves joined this church, they voted on two doctrinal questions related to landmarkism. The below quote is from S. J. Conkwright’s 1923 “History of the Churches of Boone’s Creek Baptist Association” , under the Mount Freedom Baptist Church section on page 98.
“In January, 1838, on a motion made by Joseph Minter, the following two questions were put to a vote.
1st Query: Is it right that a member of this church should commune with any other church that is not of the same faith and order? Answer: No.”
“2nd Query: Is it right for this church to receive a member’s baptism valid that was baptized by another society, that is not of the same faith and order with us? Answer: In the negative.” “
This is just one more historical example that proves that the vast majority of Baptists in the south, as well as the north, rejected alien immersion and open communion long before J.R. Graves published the Cotton Grove Resolutions in 1851. The idea that Graves invented the doctrines of Landmarkism is proved once again to be false. A special thanks to Bro. Jim Duvall for finding this important quote – http://www.geocitie s.com/baptist_ documents/ ky.jessamine. mt.freedm. bc.html
Email post by Ben Stratton Landmark Southern Baptist Group List.
Posted by Tim A. on January 12, 2008